“I wish you were all dead, I thought, and longed to say it out loud. Constance said, “Never let them see that you care,” and “If you pay any attention they’ll only get worse,” and probably it was true, but I wished they were dead. I would have liked to come into the grocery some morning and see them all, even the Elberts and the children, lying there crying with the pain and dying. I would then help myself to groceries, I thought, stepping over their bodies, taking whatever I fancied from the shelves, and go home, with perhaps a kick from Mrs. Donell while she lay there. I was never sorry when I had thoughts like that; I only wished they would come true. “It’s wrong to hate them,” Constance said, “it only weakens you,” but I hated them anyway, and wondered why it had been worth while creating them in the first place. (15)
All I could say when I finished reading We Have Always Lived in the Castle was, “Man, that was one weird little book!” I still think its, but in a totally good way. It’s a perfect read for RIP IV; it’s so delightfully creepy and frightfully suspenseful.
Constance and Mary Katherine, along with their Uncle Julian, live in their family house, the Blackwood house as it is known in their small town and only venture into town when they need supplies. When Mary Katherine goes into town, it is a constant assault from the angry townspeople, but the readers have to be patient to figure out what exactly it is that the town hates so much. It’s this suspense that propels the reader along, desperate for some sort of explanation for Mary Katherine and Constance’s strange behavior.
When their cousin Charles arrives, the suspense steadily intensifies, until the climactic moment when the emotions overwhelm the town and culminate in a terrifying scene. Here the truth is revealed, but it still leaves the reader unsure of what exactly to think. This is where you should stop reading, if you haven’t read We Have Always Lived in the Castle, because I’m about to break out the spoilers.
Please highlight the below text to read the spoilers!
I have been thinking a lot about this novel and whether or not I believe anything Mary Katherine told me. She’s a narrator who, we learn at the end, is mentally unstable. She is given to anger that leads her murder people she truly loves and she has strange habits such as burying fetishes. The quote I picked from the novel was very telling for me, because Mary Katherine insinuates that she has “created” the town. So what exactly does that mean? Is she delusional? Is her power trip so involved that she believes she has created the town from her own thoughts? Or is it something more?
This is where my theory comes in. At what point, or to what lengths, can we trust Mary Katherine as a narrator? I think there’s no doubt that she’s unreliable as a narrator, but how far does it go? I think it could be read to go even further than I originally believed: perhaps it is all in Mary Katherine’s head. Everything from the town, to the forest, to her cat, to Constance. It would be some kind of explanation for the mysterious way people always act to the extreme. I like Eva‘s reading that Constance is very brave, for taking over the care of her sister, but I think there might be another reason. It is certainly a world that Mary Katherine would have preferred; having her sister give up her life entirely to take care of her is a fate almost worse than death.
One other scene also led me to believe this. Uncle Julian went insane after being exposed to the arsenic and facing the death of his entire family, but at one point he said something very strange. I believe Charles was talking to him and said: “Why won’t your niece speak to me?” Or something to that effect, and Uncle Julian responded: “I don’t have a niece. She died in the orphanage.”
Here we are again with two readings. Most likely he is projecting his own desires for Mary Katherine’s death after the brutal murder of his wife and brother’s family. He just said that because he prefers to believe that she is no longer living. But maybe, just maybe, there is more to that simple sentence. Maybe Mary Katherine did die and this is her version of heaven. Maybe Mary Katherine is still in that orphanage, thinking up this disturbing world, where everyone lives for her.
I don’t really think there’s one right answer to this question, just several ways of reading it. That’s what makes this book so darn good, in my opinion. There are at least three ways to see this strange story, and many more that I haven’t thought of. I really loved it and can’t recommend it enough.
How much do you trust Mary Katherine? Were you confused by her and the townspeople’s actions? Did you catch any other subtle hints in the novel to explain some aspect of the story?
90% – A quick, suspenseful and psychological read. Highly recommended, especially for this time of year!
A Book Blog. Period.
A Striped Armchair
Hey Lady! Watchya Readin?
Bold. Blue. Adventure.
things mean a lot
Care’s Online Book Club
So Many Books
books i done read